ĀVĀSYAM – The place of living
ĀVĀSYAM – The place of living

ĀVĀSYAM – The place of living

(Semester 4; 2020-21)

THE DESIGN BRIEF: BACKGROUND
SYAMANTAK

In such ecologically sensitive & culturally rich setting of Dhamapur village, Syamantak: a center for experiential, lifelong learning and sustainable living is located. “Our education is related to our Mother Earth & nobody should be forced to leave his village for bread, butter & education” – the thought forms an integral part of their ethos.

Processes of self-designed organic learning are run by the residents of Syamantak community. They believe in a system of education where it uses real life activities as a medium of spiritual self-evolvement, exploration of social entrepreneurship skills with the perspective of ecological sustainability and social justice.

ĀVĀSYAM – The place of living

(: Sanskrit; meaning abode, residence, home, place of living)

Although Syamantak currently has residential facilities, it is looking to construct a separate residential facility for its students, mentors & visitors, in the nearby area. The residential facility is imagined to follow a similar ethos in its Architecture and hence be developed on lines of self-sustainability in terms of planning and materials used. However, the Architectural Designer can take the freedom to interpret these ideas in his/her own way and hence come up with a contemporary yet traditional solution.  

PRE- DESIGN INQUIRIES

While the broader idea of the studio revolves around interpreting an Architectural Form in a unique setting like Dhamapur, the studio intends to seek answers to the following research questions:

  1. What could be the architectural approach to design in a setting which in itself has a strong character and identity?
  2. How can Architecture fit in or stand out in terms of sustainability?

The following set of design inquiries are crucial for the given project: 

1. How does the perception of ‘Home’ change with cultural context, individual identity and economy? 

2. Does materiality and material culture affect the idea of a ‘Home’?

3. What are the effects of climatic context and natural setting on a house FORM? 

4. Can the configuration of a house-form go beyond the understanding of mere functionality? 

Studio mentors:

Anuradha Wakade, Chaitra Sharad, Mythili Shetty, Payoja Raikar, Prachi Nadkarni, Rajan Subhedar

Projects by the students

Gargi Kulkarni
Fullscreen Mode
Daksh Jain
Fullscreen Mode
Sayam Mulani
Fullscreen Mode
Nimish Sawant
Fullscreen Mode
Shrutika Walunj
Fullscreen Mode
Prathamesh Patil
Fullscreen Mode
Vaishnavi Desai
Fullscreen Mode

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You cannot copy content of this page

%d bloggers like this: